Unit 3           Policy in Distance Education

Objectives:

  1. To understand the policy issues facing distance education programs.
  2. To understand the importance of being an accredited distance education program.
  3. To understand the importance of standards in distance education.

**********************************************************

Commentary

I have done a quick summary of each of the articles for this policy unit.  They cover a wide variety of policy issues but by no means all of them. 

The Kovel-Jarboe policy article is on moving from the margin to the mainstream.  The beginning of the article talks about how distance education doesn't fit into most state policies.  I can tell you I have worked with this issue first hand as I have been on the coordinating committee for the Electronic University Consortium for the regental institutions.  The main question is who are the stakeholders and how do they affect the five policy clusters mentioned in the article. 

Partnerships are the key in the Spears and Tatroe article.   Developing language for policy and procedures among partners can be a daunting task.  It is important to keep the lines of communication open.  Developing and maintaining partnerships is time consuming but having a good working partnership is worth the time and effort, especially in these days of declining resources.

The Dallet and Opper article is a good case study to describe the issue of limited or shrinking resources and not enough funding to provide technical answers to the issues.  Another issue that appeared in this article is the difference between the students' concepts of technology and those of the faculty/administration.  It demonstrates the need for distance education and secondary/higher education administration to keep up on technology.  Is this an issue in your program? 

The Gellman-Danley article talks about one the most important issues in distance education, that of standards and accreditation.  There are way too many "diploma mills" on the Web today. It is so easy to create a virtual institution.  One example, that has had its home base in South Dakota, is Trinity College and University.  You can check it out at www.trinity-college.edu/.  You can receive a certificate for $175, an associate degree for $375, and a bachelor degree for $795.  I worked with Don Jorgenson, at KELO TV, to expose this diploma mill, that had its base in Sioux Falls.  Last year the state legislators passed a bill to keep non-accredited institutions out of the state.  At one point there were 20 diploma mills in the state because we had no legislation to prohibit them.  Last summer I  did an interview on the issues related to the diploma mills for the Argus Leader.

It is important when you look at any institution to check its accreditation and make sure it is accredited by a regional accrediting agency.  Trinity has set up its own accrediting agency, www.aoaex.org.  Many of the institutions it lists on its accrediting page are valid institutions and many are fighting to get their names off the list.  Dakota State had been on the list with several other South Dakota institutions but we finally have our names removed from the list.

The article lists several good practices you can review.  I have provided the URL for the Western Cooperative Best Practices document, www.wiche.edu/telecom/Article1.htm.  The best practices document is in PDF format and is 16 pages long.

Copyright and intellectual property issues are very important to both distance education faculty and administrators.  The current copyright policy for Dakota State uses the fair use guidelines until all legal determinations have been made for distance education.  What type of policy does your organization have?  As a program administrator how do you deal with obtaining copyright permission and how do you deal with potential violators?

 

Home        Back to Lessons Page